Skip to main content
Pagegazer

How we measure

Every conclusion is only as good as the data it is based on. That's why we use peer-reviewed, laboratory-validated methodology, delivered entirely through the browser.

Eye tracking

Our webcam-based eye tracking measures where participants look with 1.4° spatial accuracy validated against EyeLink 1000 laboratory systems in peer-reviewed research. We capture fixation locations, fixation duration, dwell time, saccades, and time-to-first-fixation.

When we recommend it

Every study type, this is our core signal to measure attention.

Honest limitations

Lower spatial resolution than most hardware eye trackers, 30Hz sampling rate or lower depending on the device, requires adequate lighting and stable head posture, some participants will be excluded for poor calibration.

Eye tracking visualization example

Gaze scan path for a single participant. Numbers indicate fixation order; circle size indicates fixation duration.

Behavioral measurements

We capture clicks, scrolls, navigation paths, time-on-task, hover patterns, reaction times, choices, and keystrokes.

When we recommend it

Digital experience usability testing (task time, errors, effort), behavioral & custom research (reaction times, choices), any study that requires behavioral data.

Honest limitations

None, our behavioral measurements are millisecond precise and reliable.

Behavioral measurements visualization example

Self-checkout usability test: three kiosk layouts × two age groups across task time, revisits (an error proxy), and total mouse-path length. Design B stays robust with age; Design C collapses for the 60+ group.

Surveys & self-report

Alongside the implicit signals we collect demographics, screening questions, attitude scales, and post-task ratings in the same platform. Explicit responses give the behavioural and biometric data context: they segment the sample, explain why subgroups responded differently, and surface the gap between what people say and what their attention and physiology show they did.

When we recommend it

Most studies. Demographics are almost always useful to segment the sample; post-stimulus ratings help capture conscious preference; attitude and intent scales help compare stated response against measured attention and emotion.

Honest limitations

No technical limitations. We usually don't treat it as an outcome on its own, but as a complement to the implicit measures.

Surveys & self-report visualization example

Post-task agreement items, split by gender. Both groups read the design as premium — but only women turn that into purchase intent, a divergence the aggregate would hide.

Heart rate measurement (rPPG)

Remote photoplethysmography extracts heart rate / pulse from the webcam video feed. No contact sensor needed. Indicates physiological engagement, arousal, and stress response.

When we recommend it

Ad & video research (engagement timeline), checkout flows (stress at payment), any study where physiological response matters.

Honest limitations

Less precise than contact sensors. Affected by lighting conditions and participant movement.

Heart rate measurement (rPPG) visualization example

Heart rate over time (rPPG).

Facial expression analysis

Facial landmark detection and expression classification captures emotional response in real time. We measure 7 basic expressions, valence (positive/negative), and arousal.

When we recommend it

Ad & video research (emotional arc), packaging (preference response), any study where emotional response is a key question.

Honest limitations

Facial expressions vary across cultures. Not all inner states produce visible expressions.

Pack AA
Pack A
Emotions
joy24%
surprise32%
Arousal
0.65
Valence
+0.42
Pack BB
Pack B
Emotions
joy28%
surprise19%
Arousal
0.41
Valence
+0.55
Pack CC
Pack C
Emotions
joy28%
surprise35%
Arousal
0.78
Valence
-0.10
Pack DD
Pack D
Emotions
joy8%
surprise6%
Arousal
0.31
Valence
-0.35

Joy and surprise responses, mean arousal, and mean valence across four packaging variants.

Data quality controls

We validate individual participant data quality through calibration thresholds, environmental checks (lighting, camera angle), and statistical validation. Typical exclusion rates are 5–10%. All findings include sample sizes, power analysis, and significance testing.

Privacy and ethics

All studies are GDPR-compliant. Participants give informed consent, can withdraw at any time, and their data is processed locally in the browser before any transmission. No face data or other personally identifiable data ever leaves the browser. We offer configurable data exports and can provide DPAs for regulated industries.

Our advantage

Our unique advantage is that we are both UX researchers and platform providers in one. This means we can offer the best of both worlds: We understand the requirements of commercial research, but also provide the latest technologies and the power of a web-based platform.

Questions about our methodology?

We welcome scrutiny.

Book a discovery call →